Thomas Gunn: "For example, laissez-faire may maximize economic utility, but it also creates great inequality. Is this good? That's a fundamentally moral question."Why is it "fundamentally moral"? I can see how it might be a question of buy Zithromax individual values, but I don't see it as an overriding issue of morality--something with a king of objective truth. Both positions can have have rational points of view."When you refer to 'good of society' as a guiding principle of law, you pre-suppose a consensus, which often but not always exists."I don't believe I made that presupposition; I only raised it to figure out what people mean by "morally value," a concept that Zithromax 250mg still has not been made obvious. I think there is a big difference between what I think is "good" (outcomes that I would prefer to see or not see) and the "morality" that that some people think should be imposed on everyone regardless of their own subjective notions or the consequences (or lack thereof) that would follow.And again, if "morality" alone is sufficient, where does it stop buy generic Zithromax? Can a community justify any law by slapping the "morals" label on it? After all, who are we to question anyone else's self-described fundamental moral beliefs? Are you serious? If I sign a contract to pay a 30-year mortgage but then decide I don't like the payments should the government not enforce the contract? If I sign a contract for insurance but the company won't pay when the terms dictate should the government not enforce the contract? This is one of the few legitimate functions of a limited government generic Zithromax that actually allows society to function. By mutual consent, legal entities under the jurisdiction of a legitimate government enter into contracts with the understanding that they will be enforced or adjudicated in case of dispute by elements of that government. In the absence of this neutral party (the government) that has a monopoly on the use of force, the system that remains is textbook anarchy Zithromax 500mg. In a system of anarchy there are limited means for rational resolution of conflicts. The very purpose of government is to prevent this. Marriage is an inherently discriminatory institution, something that doesn't change when "gay marriage" is legalized; married couples will still recieve govt benefits and advantages that unmarried couples do not. If you oppose traditional marriage because it's discriminatory, you want to see the institution eliminated entirely, not merely extended to new groups buy Zithromax Is there any law preventing killers and child molesters form being married? What kind of parents do they make? While I never left my "ick factor" argument, I don't think your "new line" is nearly as objective as you suppose. For example, what's magic about the number two Zithromax 250mg? Why would genetic defects be a concern once we have de-linked matrimony from procreation? My problem with the decision is that it takes the untenable position that morality is not an acceptable basis for law. I say it is, and I think I've given as good as I've gotten on that one. A desire to preserve the language and traditions of "super duper sacred" marriage is a position based upon moral values. As is a desire to provide children nourishing food, or old people health care, or to protect animals from torture. Majorities think these objectives are "good" "fair" and "right," not necessarily "useful. Zithromax 500mg" No apologies there.